Hi all,
Is there much difference in sound or playability between the various Burkes? Aluminum/Brass/Composite? Narrow/Session bore?? How does one choose?? ![]()
Thanks!
Davey
Hi all,
Is there much difference in sound or playability between the various Burkes? Aluminum/Brass/Composite? Narrow/Session bore?? How does one choose?? ![]()
Thanks!
Davey
I have a composite Burke Narrow Bore D and a Brass Session D. Compared to the brass, the composite is very pretty sounding, but I think itâs too soft for playing in a session, and its tone isnât as whistle-like. Also, it is more fragile. Iâm not sure, but I think the narrow bore requires more breath control. If I was wanting to play with others, Iâd go with the brass.
I took 3 Burkes to a house session a few weeks ago - one brass, one Aluminum, one composite (all session bore).
Although all unmistakably from the burke stable and wonderfully balanced and in-tune, they each have their own character - the brass has that wrap-around warmth, the Aluminum is deep crystal and the Composite is brash and present. Of the 3 experienced whistlers at the session each of the 3 whistles found a favourite. I was happy to sit quietly and enjoy the inter-play.
I have heard that in the hands of a novice, these whistles annoy the old-hands at a session, but in those same old hands they take the session to a new level.
They are loud enough if you have something worth shouting about. I supose in a year or 2 I might be good enough if I keep up the practice ![]()
(there were a number of concertinas and fiddles at this session - 3 Burkes were enough)
It sounds like the composite session bore is loud enough to be heard or irritate! I suppose that means that itâs the narrow borishness that makes my narrow bore composite quiet.
Iâm getting dazed and confused! ![]()
One says:
âCompared to the brass, the composite is very pretty sounding, but I think itâs too soft for playing in a session, and its tone isnât as whistle-like.â
Another says:
"Although all unmistakably from the burke stable and wonderfully balanced and in-tune, they each have their own character - the brass has that wrap-around warmth, the Aluminum is deep crystal and the Composite is brash and present. "
The first sways me toward composite, the second towards brass! âSoftâ and âpretty-soundingâ is good as I just practice solo in a small apartment, but âbrashâ doenât sound so good. Youâd think a composite would be less âbrashâ than metal? âWrap-around warmthâ sounds very nice. Can I get a hot cocoa with that? Or should it be an Irish coffee!? ![]()
Thanks,
Davey
AZWâs composite is the narrow-bore, which is what makes it soft. The session-bore (regardless of material) will be louder and more brash.
Iâm very happy with my DAS Aluminum session-bore, which is very pure and can project, but is not at all shrill or brash. It plays well quietly also. Iâve never had a chance to try other Burkes. I suspect any of them would suit you.
Iâve never met a Burke I would characterize as âbrashâ . Maybe Iâm missing Mitchâs point. They say a lot things differently âDown Underâ. ![]()
Between the aluminum and brass I prefer the brass because I prefer the more substantial weight (Iâm a manly whistler
). I donât know that there is a ton of difference in the tone.
The composites are another story. They consistently tend to have a warmer, more complex tone than their purer sounding metal counterparts. I dearly love them. Their only downfall is that they are more fragile and can chip or break if treated disrespectfully.
Doc
I was comparing Burke to Burke - none of which could be called âbrashâ if compared to, say, a Generation
I just find thereâs more goat in the composite (now thereâs an adjective
)
First it sounds like weâre talking about fine wines, now weâre resorted to farm animal analagies! ![]()
Quite the versatile instrument, the whistle⌠somewhere between a fine Chardonnay and a goat! ![]()
In any case, it doenât sound like I can go too far astray with any burke.
Thanks for the opinions everyone. ![]()