Have you ever tried a new whistle, and in a few minutes, concluded that it just wasn’t what you expected or what you thought you had wanted? I did that with two of Michael Burke’s low Ds not long ago.
First, I ordered a Composite Low D Pro, because I had read favorable reports of Chiffers who had tried, and liked them, and I liked the sound clip on Clips and Snips of the jig on the EZ Comp low D. I’m a slow air lover, but the last note that was held for a longer period of time on that jig got my attention. In general, I liked the softer tone of it also.
I read Michael’s description of this whistle-" Sweet powerful mellow tone"-and I thought, that’s perfect! So, after it arrived, within 5 minutes of playing it, I had come to the conclusion that it just wasn’t what I had thought it would be. I returned it, and asked to exchange it for the Aluminum Viper Low D, which Michael sent along to me.
The same thing happened; within 5 minutes, it was back in the box, and I emailed Michael saying that it wasn’t what I was looking for tonewise, either. Michael took them back, with no problem. He has a 30 day return policy.
Here’s my advice that I can say, is probably very good advice, even if it does come from me. If you first try a whistle that is new to you, don’t form any quick emotional opinions as to what the sound IS NOT. Play it, and hear what it is on it’s own merits. Try not to compare it to another whistle and judge it solely on that narrow viewpoint. It will likely fail this test 9 out of 10 times, just because it is different to what you know already. Give it time. I imagine that is why Michael and other smart makers allow you time with their whistle to really see what makes it unique and worthy of their name and efforts.
How did I realize this all of a sudden? No, I don’t spend a lot of time thinking why I did things and how I could live life differently. But, I did start thinking about it when someone else mentioned that they liked the Burke Composites, and I know that I have heard that quite a few times. It just didn’t make sense that I would dismiss that whistle so quickly like I had. So, I thought, the next time one comes up for sale on Chiff, I would try it again.
I think you can guess the rest! It’s a great whistle, all on it’s own qualities, not of other whistles. It is mellow, woody, sweet even in the higher register, and has enough presence to be heard. I don’t know if I would say powerful, but it has a strong quality, without the edge of the metal whistles. This is where I think I missed it, the comparison to a metal low D. It’s just not going to have that metal bite and because it is made up of a unique material in the whistle world, it will have it’s own sound. I love it! Sweet, it is, and yes, unique! In a perfect world, it would have the strength of tone in the lowest notes of a good flute, but that rarely happens in a low whistle anyway.
I will qualify my non-technical review also by saying that the whistle I bought used was Michael’s earlier Comp Pro; mine was made in Feb 2000. He has since made improvements to the whistle in the tuning slide, and I believe the fipple, but has kept the material the same. Thinking back, I would bet that the tone is very similar between them.
My apologies to Michael for judging his whistles too quickly, and not on their own terms, and instead, expecting tonal qualities I liked in other whistles to be the same in his. Apples and Oranges, I believe when all things are considered. Michael has a reputation for making a great whistle, and even though they aren’t everyone’s idea of the perfect whistle, he will no doubt make quite a few people happy with his, if they try them with an open mind. This also goes for any whistlemaker’s whistles-take time with a new whistle and get to know it before judging it; just like people, we’re all different. I’d say, that’s probably a good thing, too!