Ok, so I have a half set with the traditional wood blowpipe stock on the bag. The one that has the tapered wood thingy which the blowpipe fits over. With this I actually use a piece of tubing that has a 3/4" inner diameter and just slides over the stock. The old blowpipe with the wood socket got broken a while ago.
I also have a bag that I use when I just don’t want to lug the half set around and use a practice set. That bag has the short stock that you’d use with a blowpipe that has the check valve attached. It has a tenon on either end, one just slides into the bellows outlet and the other slides into the bag inlet.
Both bags are different shapes, ages, and sizes but I can tell a difference when using the two different blowpipes. The one with the integrated check valve has a small aperature compared to the larger simple rubber tubing setup. The traditional bag stock has a smaller ID than this tubing, but larger than the newer one. The newer one seems to not allow as much a ir in as the simple rubber tubing/trad. stock, but on the other hand may be easier to control, or maybe not.
So, now that I’ve formed my question in a long-winded manner, can the experts here advise on which is more advantageous in the long run? They’re both fine to use to me, but I’m wondering if down the road I’ll find that one is better than the other. I know that these are designed the way they are for a reason. My setup with the rubber tubing and trad. stock deviates from the maker’s design (the wood socket had a smaller aperature. Or is it one of those things where as long as it works for me, I shouldn’t think about it too much? I always think too much…
I guess I should clarify why I’m asking. I’m getting ready to get a new bag for the half set and I’m trying to decide just to tie in the old stock and keep using that arrangement, or get one of the other type made so that I can use the same blowpipe.