I’ll make my point here: In the past I have looked at websites to see if a whistle that attracted my attention was for me. In more than one case I found the soundclips on the maker’s website to be played by someone struggling, someone barely out of the beginner-stages. In more than one case this put my off buying the whislte because I could not get a decent impression of the whistle and I didn’t want to pour 80-100 into a product I wasn’t sure I would enjoy.
I listen fairly specifically to what I want from an instrument and I want an example of the sound on a website to give me that information. If a player on a maker’s website is not able to control the intonation of the instrument he is playing, it is impossible to tell if that’s a problem with the whistle or with the player.
My post in the other thread caused, ofcourse, a bit of a storm (although as someone said one in a styrofoam cup). But someone else (in an e-mailed comment on things) suggested how people would react buying a piano and finding a twelve year old with two years of piano tuition under the belt hammering out Mary had a little Lamb on the piano seller’s website.
Some suggested they didn’t want a ‘pro’ to play clips. I must point out I never suggested that either but it would be good to have someone with a grasp and a basic control of the instrument playing. Someone both able to play the music (and if you don’t want to play Irish music, then don’t but don’t come out with something totally mangled and badly phrased and say "i’ll play what I like’ but play some music you are familiar with and good at) and basic technique so there aren’t any intonation issues you’d find in a beginner’s playing. Not too much too ask is it? All I am asking is a fair representation of an instrument so I can have some help (and I know a clip is only a help but you can get at least an impression from it) deciding if I want the instrument or not.
As for some of the comments posted here and elsewhere, this is not about me enjoying someone’s playing or not, this is about context. The playing would have been fine in other contexts, for example when posted for entertainment of the listener or showcasing the player’s development. Representing a whistle on a maker’s website was not a suitable context and it was that context I was very clearly referring to in my comment.
So petty attempts at sarcasm like james’:
Maybe my ears aren’t quite as educated as some, but maybe that’s actually a good thing, as I don’t want to get quite so educated that I can’t enjoy “just regular playing” anymore.
are out of place. Maybe I should remind James of the time he sent me this:
I have become convinced that in our interactions I have wronged you, not once but many times. […] I realize at this late date there is no reason you should accept an apology from me after I’ve made a horse’s ass out of myself so many times, but if you would consider accepting my apologies I would consider it a great favor.
and maybe ask him if he has reverted to his old ways? Because all I can see here is him trying to score points by reading meanings into my words I did not at any time imply.